🔗 Share this article

The true crime genre has a new medium, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: officer-worn camera recordings. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, at times in the harsh glare of vehicle beams or torches as the officers approach, their faces and voices expressing wariness or fear or indignation or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we frequently incidentally glimpse the faces of the officers themselves, one standing by blankly while the other asks the questions with what sometimes seems like extraordinary diffidence – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have already had the streaming service real-life crime film The Gabby Petito Case, about the slaying of an social media personality by her boyfriend, whose primary focus was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed surprisingly lenient with the perpetrator. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the grim case of a Florida mother in a city in Florida, a woman of colour whose four young kids allegedly harassed and antagonized her neighbor, a local resident. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighborhood conflicts in which the police were summoned multiple times, the accused shot Owens dead through her locked door, when Owens went to Lorincz’s house to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Investigation and State Laws

The arresting officers found evidence that Lorincz had done online research into the state's self-defense statutes, which permit householders and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of threat. The movie builds its story with the officer recordings generated during the multiple officer calls to the scene before the shooting, and then at the horrific and chaotic crime scene itself – introduced by emergency call recordings of Lorincz calling the police in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also jail video of Lorincz which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Portrayal of the Accused

The film does not really suggest anything too complex about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her “the Karen”, an ugly jibe. The film is presented as an illustration of how “stand your ground” laws generate senseless and tragic violence. But the reality of gun ownership and the second amendment (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a late commentator famously claimed made firearm fatalities a necessary cost) is not much emphasized.

Police Interrogation and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel surprised at how little interest the police took in this point. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they may have done in footage that didn’t make the edit). Or is possessing a firearm so normal it would be like asking about kitchen appliances or toasters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what appeared to her neighbors a extended period, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another parallel, incidentally, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the holding cell, there is an remarkable scene in which the individual simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she just can’t do it. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is revealed in the end titles. A very sombre picture of American crime and punishment.